Summary

A Fox News host, Jessica Tarlov, highlighted Trump’s declining approval ratings, citing a new Quinnipiac poll showing 53% of voters disapprove of his second-term performance.

Trump is “underwater on everything” including economy, federal workforce management, Ukraine-Russia policy, and trade relations with Mexico and Canada.

The polling slide comes amid stock market tumbles, federal worker layoffs, and trade tensions.

Tarlov noted that Republican members of Congress are facing hostile town halls where constituents are challenging them on federal workforce cuts, including at the VA. Some Republicans have dismissed these angry constituents as “paid actors.”

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll take “Things you can’t say on Reddit” for 200

      But seriously, even if he was sleeping with the fish the r’s are still a huge a problem. He’s just the front guy, he’ll be replaced with another clown.

      • Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Sadly, yes. I mean, Trump knows he’s ‘close’ to his grave and needs to leave some kind of legacy - even if it’s the Hitler kind of one - his narcissistic self just wants to enter them history books as one of the big humans instead of ‘another rich guy’ as a footnote.

        Pretty sure either Elon or Vance are already lined up for when the time comes. When Trump leaves the world, and when there’s no longer actual rules preventing them from taking over and ‘fixing’ under martial law what big bad orange wrecked. At least according to them, that is.

        No matter how bad what they’re doing seems this is just the preparation stage. Things can become so, so much worse, and the more we let them consolidate power the tougher it’ll be to fight it later.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am hoping that if there is a civil war, all of Yarvin’s Cabal are killed or executed. They are traitors to humanity as a whole.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Someone should start telling him no one has visited the titanic and he could be the first.

  • girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I wonder - what is the actual audience for approval rating polls?

    The folks most affected by high prices or mass layoffs are probably struggling too much to have the time or inclination. Around 30% of the country didn’t even show up for the election, they probably won’t show up for these.

    Who does that leave us with? Can we really assume that ‘47% approval’ translates to ‘47% of all Americans approve’?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s not actually a two answer only poll, you can view it HERE

      In Quinnipiac University’s February 19 poll, 45 percent approved, while 49 percent disapproved and 6 percent did not offer an opinion and in Quinnipiac University’s January 29 poll, 46 percent approved, while 43 percent disapproved and 11 percent did not offer an opinion.

      In today’s [March 13th] poll, Republicans (89 - 9 percent) approve of the job Trump is doing, while Democrats (96 - 2 percent) and independents (58 - 36 percent) disapprove.

      EDIT: Formatting error

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Am I the only one who thinks 53% of people disapproving of his performance is actually a pretty good record for him. This number should be in the 90’s.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think if you give it a month or two that number is going to change significantly. Most people haven’t really started to feel/see the consequences of his actions yet, and there is a bit of a lag.

    • hapablap@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You have to take into account that at least 30% of the total are likely “Trump is sent by God and is devinely inspired and therefore can do no wrong” crowd. So when his disapproval number hits 70% that’s as high as it’ll go.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Except I thought he was only elected by 31% of the public and at least a small portion of them are turning against him too. Remember a lot of people didn’t vote.

  • soycapitan451@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When the UK last had a moron setting everything on fire she was outlasted by a lettuce.

    Americans need to up their game.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sadly the US system is not designed to oust the president that easily. It would be a first if Trump was removed from office due to the impeachment process, removing the prime minister is a much lower bar.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Impeachment should theoretically work but when the system was put in place it didn’t account for an entire political party turning fascist

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It actually did, the south was entirely fascist for it’s entire existence, they literally designed the system so the south could always veto the rest of the country combined no matter what, hence the 3/5 compromise giving them power in the house and the structure of the senate.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Impeachment should and still would work, my point was its a higher threshold than most processes to replace the PM in the UK.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    declining approval ratings, citing a new Quinnipiac poll showing 53% of voters disapprove of his second-term performance

    Another Quinnipiac poll from last month determined 45 percent approved of Trump’s performance and 49 percent disapproved.

    So half of the people still approve of what he’s doing? How does such a small percentage even justify a news article with such a ridiculous headline? The US are so cooked it’s not even funny. Wake me when it’s at 90% disapproval.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never heard of that polling agency in my life before. I had to look it up, it’s a private university in Connecticut.

      I sure didn’t get polled about any of this.

      So no, more precisely, half of all people polled by this one school in a state that nobody talks about approve of what he’s doing. I’m willing to bet half of those people have no idea what’s going on.

      I have a very hard time believing that half of all Americans are happy and content with current events. I live here, I hear people complain.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you honestly believe good polls call everyone for a poll, or that they need to to get good results?

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I do think they need to have a good sample size to get results that make sense, yes.

          Doing some research on it, seems like Quinnipiac’s standard polling is conducted “in more than 20 states and cities as well as nationally” (particular locations not specified) and has typically 1,000+ respondents using random digit dialing. Meaning they just slap random numbers into the phone and see who picks up.

          I can’t say I can immediately come up with a better solution right off the top of my head right now, but I can identify several problems with their approach, namely being actual size of sample (1000 respondents is 0.000003% of the population) and the way they gather their responses (when was the last time you answered the phone for an unknown caller? Now when was the last time your grandmother did?).

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What stands out to me is that they are making a big deal out if a small change…to a Republican approval rating. This is exactly the type of data they’d be holding up while screaming about how bad Obama is, for instance. Did feel odd using the tactic against their own, let alone god emperor Cheeto.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re probably trying to take control of the party back from Trump. They did push back against him during his first term, but fell flat on their faces and started losing viewers to Newsmax. Now they’re trying to back it with data. They’ve spent the last few decades training their viewers to ignore data, though, so we’ll see how that goes.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can we stop bullying transpeole now and admit maybe it actually IS Trump that’s the problem?

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “The president’s approval rating has been struggling for at least a month”

    He’s only been in office 53 days… so struggling 56.6% of the time… at least.

    • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t see him starting a war without complete control of the military. While they are working on it, firing leadership, changing rules and policies, the military still has the power to say no to Trump, which is bad TV. Trump is also a bitch as seen by the wishy-washy way he approaches tariffs, he hates actual action because he just wants good TV and bad policy makes for bad TV.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s absolutely crazy is he just signed an EO to get rid of USAGM…

    For those who don’t know, that’s basically the propaganda arm of the US government and has been for a very long time.

    This is probably the most surprising thing so far for me, I really thought he’d expand that to do more work domestically to counteract all the bad press and approval loss his actions are resulting in.

    Like, I get why Putin doesn’t want the rest of the world to like us, but it’s just crazy they’re getting rid of USAGM instead of just changing the propaganda it spreads.

    Actually kind of relieved to see it shut down, this is a weird morning.

      • AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Genuinely, though, it is hard to gauge at times which actions are:

        • Genuinely malicious plans to increase his and his cronies’ wealth
        • Confused, because Elon or Trump were in a specific mood that particular day
        • Some actor behind the scenes manipulating them by taking advantage of their impulsivity
        • The genuine incompetence of the newly appointed loyalists (or the algorithms/AI they use) within the new deep state
        • Genuinely ideologically motivated stupidity, from Libertarians that drank their own cool-aid within the administration.

        It is genuine chaos. But overall, the effects are pretty disastrous, no matter what exactly causes which actions.

        • Zachariah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s narcissism all the way down. His sole motivation for anything is ego stroking. He lacks self esteem and the ability to value himself. His self worth only exists in validation from others.

    • Dzso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m looking at Trump as a Russian agent who was assigned to dismantle the US government. Everything he does makes sense when you look at it that way. And it’s horrifying.