That’s pretty diverse. And yeah, I don’t think even Trump knows what’s going to happen.

I thought most clothing was now made in Vietnam and Indonesia?

This is more about the type of ID you need mixed with the cost/effort of acquiring that ID.

Essentially, changes to ID laws impact voting by:

• Making voting cost money - the government doesn’t provide these IDs for free
• Making voting cost more time - getting theses IDs may require people (especially women who have changed names) to spend time navigating the beuracracy to get all the documents they need for the new ID requirements

At the end of the day, voting should be free and people shouldn’t be penalized for how they do it. These kinds of laws try to make voting time intensive and expensive, meaning many people may not be able to vote.

I always wonder how many of these are actually just patches behind the scene to fix viral trends. Or even more devious, they use the viral trends to patch a specific failure point to make it feel like progress is being made.

5.3 is the number in default, there are a lot more with student debt in general (online resources say around 42 million).

I also think the article mentions there are millions more at risk of being in debt, but that’s a whole other can of worms cause (as is the case with Trump and Republicans) communication about loan repayment is unclear.

I think the real point of the adage, “once it’s on the internet it’s there forever” is more about the fact that you, personally, can’t take it back. Someone might of screenshot, downloaded it, reuploaded it elsewhere. The real meaning being that, once it’s on the internet, you no longer control it. Which I think still holds true, but it definitely was heavily implied that it would be there forever.

I’ll give you three guesses.

Yeah, it’s more of a single statement from a discredited cop (interfered with an investigation to tip off a prostitute he was paying) rather than a case. But ultimately that doesn’t matter, even if they had a case, that requires you bring it to court.

For the US maybe, but right now it seems like the wider world may survive.

At the rate we’re going, I fear that may be an understatement.

Came here to add this.

Definitely better to watch with subtitles.

I’ve been thinking converting some assets to cash and keeping some of that as actual physical cash might not be the worst idea.

I don’t think anyone expected almost blowing up the bond market. Why do you think it should’ve been obvious he’d tarrifs the world+allies?

No it’s not mandatory, although sounds like some states may require it.

If that’s true that’s actually comforting, not only are there smart people building defenses, but they’re able to rein trump in.

Yeah, I’ve been trying to figure out what to do rather than just holding cash (cause inflation is likely to go up). But bonds don’t feel safe, I think the best bet is looking to assets outside the US, but that’s exactly what this article is calling out, the US doesn’t feel safe anymore.

I think the easiest way would be to have two vlans on your local network. One that is connected to the internet and another that is local only. I think you’d have to switch networks when wanting to access the jellyfin server in that instance, but would negate the main issue, which is your VPN.

Edit: that’s about the most secure you can get I think. If you bought a different physical router to host it, you’d have about as secure a setup as possible.

Yeah, I like their good fellow brand. It walks the line of cheap but fashionable well enough for me.

Outside of that, I appreciate having a brick and mortar store to shop for somethings. Buying things like clothes online is just painful to me.

God they’re going to say everything people are angry about was Musks fault and try to shift the blame.

Definitely, and that’s why hard/strict laws or rules can be dangerous. Much like the famous “I know it when I see it” judgment on obscenity.