That’s just wild. The one silver lining to T2 is that I’m not shocked by anything anymore. It’s still outrageous, but the surprise is gone.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    First this, then releasing 10000 pages worth of John F. Kennedy files. lol these are right out of the dictator’s handbook to public agenda manipulation. Trump can’t even do the dictator thing very well, it is such a rookie level move.

    • glitch1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would have preferred a simple 1 page faq with who did it and how was the government involved if at all.

  • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    But I thought conservatives said COVID was all made up and a plot by the democrats to control the populace through mask-wearing?

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Note that mask-wearing only makes it so you can’t breathe if Democrats want you to do it for public health reasons. Mask-wearing is hunky dory if you’re doing it because you’re a Nazi who doesn’t want to be personally identified.

  • AnguishedNarwhal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I always wondered what it would be like to live in oppressive regimes like Russia or China. Also never thought I’d live through a pandemic. Checking all the boxes lately.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That website is batshit. It looks like a tabloid website. It’s not just promoting the plan leak theory. It also calls out Fauci, Andrew Cuomo, and Biden. It is basically a political hit piece. Fucking embarrassing.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t think there’s enough evidence to conclusively say that it was natural or that it was a lab leak. There is actually quite a lot of evidence that it was a lab leak, but this website looks like such BS.

    There’s also good evidence that Jeanne Calment was not the world’s oldest woman, but was instead her mother. Also, it’s well-understood that lightbulb manufacturers conspired to lower lifespans of bulbs throughout the 20th century. Just because there was a conspiracy don’t mean it ain’t real.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Here’s an analysis of a debate about whether it is or is not a lab leak. There’s very compelling arguments on both sides, but I find the lab leak angle to have the most evidence for it.

        I think I understand why people assume it can’t be a leak – it sounds like fiction; people have said this about previous events and turned out to be wrong; it would be bad for China if true, so it must be politically motivated. It’s okay, you can relax and join me in the ranks of people who are open minded to either outcome.

        (Edit: This is a stupid aside, but you define theory as something with no evidence for it, and then put lab leak “theory” in quotes as though you don’t think it fits that definition.)

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The tall letters in all caps.
    The dramatic fade to blue.
    Trump standing in the middle.
    The fancy font on 𝓒𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭.

    Oooh the tackiness is too much to bear

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So did it originate in a Wuhan Lab or not? I keep hearing one thing then another.

    Not trying to confuse the issue, I legitimately don’t know.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No one know because China are not going to admit if it was a lab leak. Also lab leaks doesn’t mean the virus is human made. However there are some un-answerd questions. There were scientists spies that got caught with sample from Canadian labs flying to China, and there was some concern about military funding and other few things that support the leak theory. However it is not conclusive evidence. So it stay at the theory level.

  • thiseggowaffles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look, I can’t stand Trump, but he’s at least partially right on this one. It’s fucking obvious to anyone who has done even minimal research on it. Gain of function research for coronaviruses was being done at UNC Chapel Hill until it was shut down in 2014 and moved offshore: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/11/07/361219361/how-a-tilt-toward-safety-stopped-a-scientists-virus-research

    NIH and USAID then began funding the same research through the Wuhan Institute of Virology via EcoHealth Alliance since they had to move the research offshore: https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_R01AI110964_7529 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/10/nih-admits-funding-risky-virus-research-in-wuhan

    Fauci was the head of NIH and authorized the research originally. Both the US and China have invested interest in making the allegations of a lab leak go away due to liability. It becomes obvious why Fauci wanted to squash any rumors of a lab leak since he was indirectly partially responsible for the research. It’s not a coincidence that Biden backpardoned Fauci specifically to 2014, when the gain of function research was moved overseas: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/media/1385746/dl?inline

    That said, Event 201 really is where shit gets really uncomfortable: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9-oVXQX88esnrdhaiuRdXGG7XOVYB9Xm

    Look at the timestamp of when that video was posted, who it was posted by and who all were involved. For bonus points, watch the entire thing and not just the highlights. The social media censorship aspects are a bigger part of the discussion than the highlights would suggest.

    Whether or not I think Fauci deserves to be held criminally liable for helping fund the research that likely led to the outbreak, I definitely think he should have been found liable (if not for pardons) for his attempts to bury any attempts to look into a lab leak rather than natural origin, and ostracize and ridicule people who tried to look into the possibility of a lab leak. For those who forgot, fucking Jon Stewart was one of them: https://www.yahoo.com/news/dare-jon-stewart-reflects-lab-202138738.html

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      OMG, tinfoil hat too tight??

      First of all, “gain of function” viral and bacterial research has been a critical part of research for DECADES. There is absolutely no connection nor sequence relationship between ANY of gain of function research done in Wuhan and COVID-19. ALL the fears are hypothetical. Meanwhile, this type of research is the basis for all kinds of medical and research advances for the last 30 years (gene replacement, stem cells, siRNA, on and on).

      Second, you don’t have a clue how NIH funding works. Grants are submitted to COMMITTEES at the NIH. Fauci was NEVER head of NIH, but even if he was he would have no awareness of nor control over these grants and funding. It’s not a dictatorship and one person absolutely cannot determine if a grant gets funded. It’s an incredibly arduous process that takes years and many many scientists reviewing and debating the facts and merits of the proposal, including safety protocols. Think peer review times 100. So to claim that Fauci should be held “criminally liable” is laughably ignorant.

      NONE of the sequence altering research in the Wuhan lab had any relationship from a sequence perspective to COVID19. Every credible scientist acknowledges that. Is it possible that the wild type virus was being studied in the lab and somehow got out of the lab vs in the wild? Yes, it’s possible. Does it matter? No, it does not. It was going to happen and IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. Meanwhile, people like you make ignorant fear claims that are getting research labs shut down. The same labs, like Jason McClellan’s lab at Dartmouth that did 10 years of research altering the mRNA sequence of the spike protein so that it would be accurately presented as an antigen that gave us the vaccine in 11 months. Without this “gene altering” research that could be interpreted as “scary”, we probably still wouldn’t have a vaccine.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Federal government reported the possibility without Trump in office:

      • FBI reported it was likely
      • Department of Energy joined them in saying it was possible.

      Sources

      It’s not a wild conspiracy theory. Virological gain of function research & lax safety protocols could lead to unsurprising results that aren’t necessarily malicious.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is insane how many comments here believe that humans somehow made COVID-19 in a lab and leaked it. It is obvious and clear that the critical sequences responsible for the jump to humans exist in wild type form in nature. In fact, the critical spike protein sequence is so similar between coronavirus that the antigen work which the vaccine was based upon was done BEFORE COVID-19 in Jason McClellan’s lab at Dartmouth.

    This WILL happen again, and conspiracy theories that have now shut down labs and funding are likely to cause millions of lost lives next time. We got lucky and the tinfoil hats are going to guarantee we’ll be unlucky next time.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It is obvious and clear that the critical sequences responsible for the jump to humans exist in wild type form in nature.

      In theory. In practice no evidence of these stages has been found.

      However it would be feasible to simulate the conditions required in a lab environment.

      Controlled funding for gain of function research does not mean all lab work should stop.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Let me know how “gain of function” research is different than using plasmids. I’ll wait.

    • HiddenLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, I used to believe that too. Until I read how irresponsible these scientists were. Before the outbreak, they were planning to release an enhanced version into bat caves filled with bats to observe how the coronavirus mutated. They were infecting bats in the lab with coronavirus. Nobody said they created this from scratch, but they could have definitely helped evolution along. Even the CIA suspects it could have been a lab leak. I think the problem is that thinking it is “man-made” is hard for many, but it’s not difficult to believe that the evolution of the virus was influenced by humans.

      https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/cia-shifts-assessment-covid-origins-saying-lab-leak-likely-caused-outb-rcna189284

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        it’s not difficult to believe that the evolution of the virus was influenced by humans.

        Only for the ignorant. This is how research has worked for decades. Even the CIA (who are not scientists) have “low confidence”. Since when does “low confidence” mean it happened or you believe it??

        All sequence data, wild type virus, and previous research history clearly show this virus existed in nature and because it is a highly mutable RNA virus, was able to infect humans. No credible scientist says otherwise. Let’s be clear - if they were studying the virus in a lab and it “got out” from the lab or from the wild what difference does it make? This is NOT a man made virus and to make the leap to that is just plain ignorance.

        So the ignorant human response is to shut down all research on viruses because of the fear of it being “man made”. The result? When this happens again in 3 or 100 years (which it will), we will have no R&D to lean on LIKE WE DID FOR THE COVID19 VACCINE. We’ve ALREADY discovered a number of viruses in the wild that are likely to mutate and cause another pandemic. We should be celebrating research because the previous decade of work on antigen presentation of the spike protein gave us a vaccine in 11 months that we would otherwise likely not have EVEN TODAY.

        I guess this is why ancient civilizations had human sacrifice when there was an eclipse. The stupid scared ignorant people determined public policy.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Let’s be clear - if they were studying the virus in a lab and it “got out” from the lab or from the wild what difference does it make?

          Firmer policies & enforcement of safety protocols? Informed selection of safety protocols?

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            These things already happen to an insane degree, which is good. Others are using this argument to either jump to the conclusion that it’s man made or that we should shut down all coronavirus research. There is a clear distinction between these thoughts that are being intentionally blurred by those with an agenda.

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              We ought to be vigilant about leaping to conclusions or letting biases creep in, and I can’t control others doing that.

              Concerns about biosafety standards first caught my notice with this report stating that the laboratory may have been working with coronavirus at biosafety levels as low as 2 and explaining the significance. Questioning the source (even though it seems coherent), I noticed other reports with references seem to corroborate. These laboratories may not be taking the best precautions.

              • rusticus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Okay you’ve refused to acknowledge or read my more important points so it appears you don’t want a conversation with perseverations on your agenda. Good luck.

                • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I don’t know what logically led you to that conclusion. Maybe you ought to self-reflect & work on your own biases/not jump to conclusions?

                  I’m linking to supporting references, and you’re not, so 🤷.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          All sequence data, wild type virus, and previous research history clearly show this virus existed in nature

          This is an exaggeration. There was a strain logged that was 96% similar (BatCoV RaTG13) but this lacked the proteins at the S1/S2 furin cleavage site.

          This is NOT a man made virus

          But it could be a man influenced virus.

          we will have no R&D to lean on LIKE WE DID FOR THE COVID19 VACCINE

          Vaccine research does not require gain of function studies.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can someone help me understand what’s going on here?

    Are they trying to throw shade on China because… they think it will help win the trade war?

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Actually this news makes me have a conspiracy theory now.

      • Trump started trade war with china early January 2018
      • The Wuhan was studying the corona virus in the wild as usually, mostly with relax work
      • Wuhan lab start publishing about covid in mid 2018 studying different variation
      • Wuhan lab start testing mixing covid with hiv and stuff
      • Trump loses the Trade war around late 2019
      • 2019 Military World Games is happening in Wuhan October 18–27, 2019 .

      Here is my new conspiracy theory:

      • “Ordered by trump - CIA cause the leak to happen from the lab to the market to damage the Chinese economy”

      .

      • First report of covid patient around November 2019
      • First Cluster of patient around December 2019

      Considering how the US government has been consistent of disregards of human life I see this as realistic case of why Trump keep circling back to this.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So, this is wild speculation, but I’ll tell you my guess. I think it’s about TSMC, the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturer. China has, for years, been saying that Taiwan isn’t an independent country, but is instead “Chinese Taipei,” a part of China. They’ve been using this idea for years to gradually build towards an invasion of Taiwan. Taiwan, of course, does consider itself an independent nation. The US officially holds no position on this question, which is kinda bonkers; there’s this whole diplomatic dance about whether the US would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. The US might not care if it weren’t for TSMC, which runs the plants that produce a huge proportion of the world’s CPUs and GPUs and AI chips. All the best chip-making technology and know-how is with TSMC. It’s a major vulnerability in the US supply chain.

      China has been ramping things up in the past several years. It’s suspected that a big part of why they’re going along with the Russian invasion of Ukraine is that Russia probably promised to go along with China invading Taiwan in exchange. It’s all very sub-rosa, but there’s been so much military maneuvering and posturing and so on back and forth around Taiwan that it’s been kind of dizzying.

      This is, unfortunately, part of why China was enthusiastic about getting Trump back into the White House. Trump’s policies of isolating the US from its military allies, instigating worldwide trade chaos, and cozying up to dictators make the conditions a lot more ripe for China to make a move on Taiwan. And since the US has never been able to actually talk about Taiwan before, it’s gonna look absolutely batshit to the majority of Americans if China invades Taiwan and the US government suddenly wants to go to war against China over this, which seems like a huge risk. But since, as Trump so eloquently put it, “everything is computer,” we basically can’t stand by and let China take Taiwan without a fight.

      So he’s trying to gin up sentiment against China on his own terms to lay the groundwork for a war that seems increasingly inevitable.

        • SparroHawc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s possible to have a poor opinion of the Chinese government without having a bigoted opinion about the Chinese people.

          • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Possible but not common.
            Don’t tell me you haven’t seen plenty of racist comments online directed at Chinese people.
            Same for Russians or whatever country/people we’re supposed to hate.