If I’m right about your intentions, you’re attempting to portray the author and paper as minimizing what happened to the kid. That doesn’t seem valid at all, given that a) the entire article is about what happened to the victim and outlining the case, and not disputing her claims b) it’s literally in the article as a quote, just read the thing already.
It’s the most populous state while also being one of the least developed in terms of economics, education, industry, and institutions.
There’s inherent bias to what the typical audience is expected to care about, so yes, salacious stories will be what breaks through more, rather than say people deploying renewables or having a literacy initiative.
At the same time though, there’s way too much crime and exploitation going on, largely due to the reasons above. So it’s both.
It quotes the child in the article. I’d suggest reading it before commenting on it.
No arrests “made yet”, but a case has been opened, like you’d expect anywhere else. Investigations come before the arrest.
I’m a bit disappointed to see the tendency observed on Reddit to be replicated here.
Does this article deserve more upvotes and attention than it has currently? Yes. There should be more attention paid to the case and issue broadly, and more pressure to prevent these things from ever happening. So you can stop typing that reply now. I have no problem highlighting gender inequality and crime in India, as it’s the only way to improve from what’s currently in place.
Did 26 people getting shot to death in a terrorist attack in India last week garner this much attention, or upvotes? No, not even half as much. To me that smacks of implicit biases that deserve mention and questioning.
Because it’s a literal quotation from the victim, read the article.
It’s literally in the article
The recent main one seemed to be no longer promising to not sell user data, but it’s been a culmination of little things.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-firefox-i-loved-is-gone-how-to-protect-your-privacy-on-it-now/
Personally I’ve been kind of miffed since they decided to use the experiments feature to be paid to shill for the Mr. Robot tv show, including in their enterprise release, making people think they got hacked. But that was years ago and forgotten.
And introducing guest star “… Washington!?”
Evidence is no longer a thing, due process being over and all that.
I’ve heard this one before
at the moment not enough to cause panic buying or draw significant media attention. Select goods have begun to creep up in price, and freight industry reports show projected decreases in demand, but not really seeing it yet.
Thank you for the info! I like your username.
There will be some additional time and resources required to read and write encrypted data, even if minor.
Previous versions of Windows only permitted drive encryption in their premium tiers, and it seems like the current one possibly requires a TPM chip for it, so a lot of hardware won’t even support it. So basically greed or greed.
For what it’s worth it’s not always a default with Linux installations either. There’s a usually minor performance hit, though I can’t say it ever bothered me. Personally I have less fear of bad actors obtaining physical access than I do myself breaking something catastrophically and losing my access, so I don’t use it now.
They can’t keep getting away with it
I figure it gets purchased by a larger, established auto firm and slowly killed off.
So the answer is, “no”, but isn’t that obvious? That’s not much of an explanation really. While pithy it’s not very useful.
As others have pointed out, some parts of the West do currently practice polygamy, or have in the past, but the reasons why it’s largely frowned upon aren’t explained in this response.
Haven’t had to use one in years.
Because in the unlikely event that this isn’t what happened and the court finds them not guilty, the paper would be liable for damages that came from making that statement. Libel law exists, so they can’t just state it.
Hence running a quote, plus using the industry standard in the article, “alleged”. After the conviction it’s a matter of legal fact.