Teledildonics.
Apparently they can also help you cheat at chess.

The ‘mistake’ of receiving more than one unsolicited nude?
He was ok with the gofundme, but wasn’t ok with you sending the gofundme to others?
And you’re supposed to report everything to him but he doesn’t do the same for you?

Your boyfriend is free to express his insecurities. And it wouldn’t be unreasonable for him to say that if you continue messaging strangers in that context, he won’t feel comfortable continuing the relationship.

It’s perfectly normal to set boundaries and to get upset when your partner crosses them, but it sounds like he’s getting upset about you crossing boundaries which he never made clear.

So not only are there unreasonable one-sided expectations, you’re also supposed to be a mind reader who knows what all of those expectations and boundaries are in advance.

deleted by creator

Him ending the relationship because you saw a dick pic and have had sex multiple times in the past just shows his immaturity and lack of commitment.
You didn’t cheat on him, you got sent a nude.
It’s not like you were planning an affair.
I bet he looks at porn all the time, would you break up with him for it?
You don’t need to report every single thing that you do to him, does he honestly do the same for you?

He’s either a stupid misogynist who holds you up to higher standards than he sets for himself, or he’s just looking for an ‘out’ to the relationship without taking any responsibility.
He’d prefer to make you feel bad than to admit he doesn’t want to continue the relationship due to his personal beliefs.

I don’t want to tell you who you should or shouldn’t date, but there are much more understanding people out there who will love you unconditionally.

Fuck I’m stupid

Am I supposed to know who any of those people are?

Depends how closely it resembles them.
If it’s indistinguishable I’d take it as a compliment, otherwise I might take it as how you would prefer me to look.

It really depends on how porn/sex-positive the SO is.
If you’re just looking for spankbank material, maybe you could do a photoshoot together?

Filters are nice too, if you’re here for escapism rather than news.

Not sure if it was a plasma issue or a wayland issue, but I tried it last year and had trouble with cursor locking.

Virtualbox had issues with the input being intermittent, and my mouse would move off the screen while gaming.

It might be fixed now, but I don’t plan on trying it again for another few years, because what I’m using works for me.

Or even worse, they might come to lemmy!

Nah the dad was too strong to be brainwashed by the babysitter’s sexual deviance. But those poor baby sperm overhead everything and became infected with the gay.

I agree that some things can be objectively immoral, but I think there’s a lot of grey/subjective areas too.

Is it objectively immoral to not spend 100% of your free time helping others?

What about choosing to have kids instead of adopting?

Turning someone’s life support machine off after they’ve been declared braindead?

Killing a serial killer in an act of self defense?

I guess I forgot to mention that those platforms usually require you to sign NDA’s that prevent you from releasing any code that references their SDK.
This makes it impossible to license your entire project as GPL/AGPL, as you would be breaking the NDA.

Using a GPL library will require you to re-license your entire project as GPL, regardless of whether you made a change or not.

LGPL is a bit better, because it allows you to dynamically link the library. But you’re required to provide a copy of source for the library, and any users must be able to swap the built library with their own copy.

Eg; you can use an AGPL-licensed .dll in your closed-source windows program, because users can swap that .dll easily.

You can’t do the same for a ps5 game because users aren’t able to replace any files that the game uses.

If you’re developing software for a platform that doesn’t allow users to replace dynamic libraries (game consoles, iOS, many embedded/commercial systems), you won’t be able to legally use any GPL or AGPL libraries.

While I strongly agree with the motives behind copyleft licenses, I personally never use them because I’ve had many occasions where I was unable to use any available library for a specific task because they all had incompatible licenses.

I release code for the sole purpose of allowing others to use it. I don’t want to impose any restrictions on my fellow developers, because I understand the struggle it can bring.

Even for desktop programs, I prefer MIT or BSD because it allows others to take snippets of code without needing to re-license anything.

Yes I understand that means anyone can make a closed-source fork, but that doesn’t bother me.
If I wanted to sell it I might care, but I would have used a different license for a commercial project anyway.

Hannah Montana Linux is always a good start