• 1 Post
  • 124 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 14th, 2024

help-circle












  • The risk just increases with multiple partners, regardless of “exclusivity.”

    And no, the second does not get solved by time management and communication - you literally have less time to spend with each wife.

    Out of one year, if you have 100 hours to spend, a truly equal amount of time is 50/50. The man gets 100 hours of intimacy, but each wife is starved of those 50 hours. If you increase the amount of time you can spend to 200 hours, then an equal split is now 100/100 and each wife is starved of 100 hours of intimacy. There is no way to prevent this with multiple partners.


  • TBH I sort of thought the tools to create convincing deepfakes are more expensive than small actors can produce.

    Like you need VRAM. Idk about the new 5090s, but my 7900XTX has 24GB and I don’t think that’s enough. (Plus it doesn’t implement the tensorflow thing AI needs I think).

    Then you need an insane amount of face data. And someone like JD Vance is almost always using the same expression in the same light. You can’t just take a porn and put for on it any better than you already could with Photoshop.

    You, of course, could create a Google training environment thing. But that ain’t cheap, and now Google knows you be doin illegal shit.

    So this law really applies to big time actors. People with wealth, time, and influence. Of course Musk would go after it.


  • Ignoring the sexist reasoning behind polygamy, there are practical ones too.

    I have one dick.

    Its risky to have sex with multiple partners. The more partners, the more that risk of STIs increases.

    The amount of intimacy (not sex, intimacy) a spouse gets with a partner decreases the more spouses one has. At some point “starvation of intimacy” will occur, leading to a breakdown in the relationship.

    Edit: I’m sorry y’all. This conversation is gross and full of bigoted male-centric talking points. Polyamory is one thing, but polygamy is fully about the man. If you refuse to see that part, you’re just an asshole trying to justify an ancient means of having power over women.




  • I’m going to talk to my hospital’s IIRB about this. I’m fairly certain the records they can access are related to existing research, and you can demand the IIRB to pull access to this data.

    Additionally, so long as it is classified as psychiatric notes, it may be possible to restrict a diagnosis further.

    If you have concerns, contact your primary care, your psychologist or psychiatrist. I don’t know what good it will do, but any healthcare provider worth their gold will raise it to their IIRB and the IIRB is the one who will be able to prevent this.

    Do not sit idle with this one. If you have the means, GTFO of the US.