

Thanks for your thoughtful response!
Thanks for your thoughtful response!
That’s how much my student subscription is, that’s why I was curious. I think it’s $6.99 plus tax?
That’s really interesting! Would you pay $8 for a no ads subscription?
Pass on what? Using YouTube at all?
If your society cannot or will not support an unmarried pregnant woman on her own, your society is a failed one.
All decent people would. I meant within the bounds of treason and tyranny.
Interesting. I didn’t think anyone was cool with any ads.
I’m curious what people would prefer for revenue generation models. Just subscription fees? A lot of folks also seem resistant to that as well.
The most frustrating part of this “article” was that it did not elucidate any aspect of the request or the scope of the project. Nobody knows the infrastructure except for the parties involved.
I believe it is centralized but it is certainly an alternative to WhatsApp. My understanding is that it’s encrypted and privacy centric.
I don’t know the details, I’m afraid. That’s just my memory.
I believe audacity was forked over issues with privacy or something like that.
Correct. If they ever roll out ads on premium, I’m not sure what we’ll do. Maybe figure out a new platform or a new way to watch.
I stopped using RIF when the dumbass who developed it started whining about open source and monetary remuneration. The app became popular in large part because it was open source.
It’s just like the nutsack who founded GitHub. A literal GPLv2 program and the guy got super rich and famous, then extolled the virtues of using lax permissive licenses. Absolute tool.
At least you appreciated my joke!
Why are you censoring the word reddit? Is that a joke?
As all decent people do.
No shit. The question is just about the current system. Your answer is like saying “How should we implement universal healthcare while capitalism still exists?” “Pass”. It doesn’t make sense.