Go back to the V10 with their amazing sound, minimal electronics & batteries. Lighter cars, maybe even refueling during the races.

Actually this season is gearing up to be quite competitive. 2024 was also more competitive than 2023.

Are you suggesting aiding and abetting a genocide is a mole problem? I beg to differ.

It is an example of hypocrisy when the Biden administration praises themselves as leader of the free world and promotes a rules based order only to be accomplices of genocide.

Of course, this does not excuse what the Trump administration is doing.

The Biden administration has been happy aiding and abetting a genocide which caused hundreds of thousands of casualties, most of them innocent women and kids.

Both sides are hypocrites. Remember Nancy Pelosi getting a haircut during Covid when regular people couldn’t? Or Gavin Newsom attending a birthday party during his own lockdown?

It’s easy enough to replace an iPhone battery

That short amount of time has devastating effects on the mental of the faster driver stuck behind the slower one.

McLaren fucked Piastri’s race when they asked him not to overtake Norris.

Enjoy it. A great number of people in the US have been conditioned to tie up their sense of worth to their job, and can’t comprehend there’s more to life.

I’d take 12 years paternity leave if I could.

Assuming your numbers are correct, after one year the interest is $70. I doubt you’d get anyone out to conduct the inspection at that price, let alone two because you need one at move in and one at move out; and let’s not even get started about potential the additional work should there be a dispute by the tenant or the landlord.

You mean they keep a portion of the deposit to determine who receives the payout? If you meant they only keep a portion of the revenues produced by the investment, which obviously must be one of the safest ones available and thus will have low return on investment, I’m afraid that would not be economically viable for the escrow company.

If you’re going to ask the government to step in, I would suggest to make building more housing easier.

What we are trying to avoid here is a conflict of interest where the third party would side with whoever pays them most of the time.

It’s important to prevent conflict of interests but asking the city to step in in every single rental agreement is not necessarily an effective solution. Someone else here suggested having the cost split between the tenant and the landlord, which has the merit of addressing the potential conflict of interest.

That’s if everything goes well. What if the tenant does not approve the photos?

A split between the parties might help avoid conflict of interests

Above $125.

Who’s going to pay this neutral third party to come see the property twice and allocate the deposit between the tenant and landlord?