

Assuming they don’t just do that anyway
Assuming they don’t just do that anyway
I’m willing to bet pharma lobbying
Reliability and defense systems, lets say you need 100 warheads for credible deterrence.
Your missiles have a success rate of 80% so no you need 120. The enemy defenses shoot down 50% so now you need 240.
So to guarantee the 100 warhead deterrence you already need 240 warheads, and this number only increases further.
Removed by mod
We are gonna SAVE AMERICA by TARRIFFING EVERYTHING but also exempting everything from these tariffs.
The same was said when the ATGM was invented. Yet the tank survived all the same.
And with APS becoming more and more common i predict we will continue to see tanks on the battlefield.
Haven’t you heard? Breathable air is DEI now.
With T-55s and T-62s still being used in this conflict I think this proves exu’s point.
A vehicle that can protect against small arms fire while lobbing 105mm HE shells is still very useful for infantry fire support.
No, but i am saying i would rather not drink disinfectants.
comment referencing Haiti and how the microorganisms will strengthen your immune system, I’m entirely unsurprised.
Clearly this wasn’t the the part I was referring to… Why would you think I would suggest not disinfecting water when a sentence later I suggest using UV disinfection.
Yes you don’t die immediately if you drink chlorinated water like if you breathe chlorine gas. However if I had to choose between drinking chlorine treated water vs drinking UV treated water all my life this choice is easy to make.
Is your argument that chlorine is as safe to consume as water?
Is your argument that chlorine is as safe to consume as salt?
Except that chlorine is highly toxic? Unless there is some other chlorine that i am unaware of that shares the name with regular chlorine that is also used as a disinfectant without being highly toxic.
Yes it does
I was not talking about Mustard gas but chlorine gas, according to wikipedia first deployed on masse during tbe Second battle of Ypres by the germans.
I already edited it to infamously anyways thats what comes to my mind at first when i think of chlorine.
And how would i propose we do this? By living in a country that already does it. Here is the page of my local water provider:
https://www.evides.nl/uw-drinkwater/productieproces/de-zuiveringsprocessen
Daarna maken we het water bacteriologisch betrouwbaar: de hoofddesinfectie. Dit gebeurt door middel van ultraviolet licht (UV).
Then we make the water bacteriologically reliable: the main disinfection. This is done by means of ultraviolet light (UV).
Being used to this type of water when i go on vacation it really smells like im drinking swimming pool water.
Unironcally yes, it shouldn’t take much convincing that a substance as dangerous as chlorine mostly known for being used as a chemical weapon shouldn’t be in drinking water when UV sterilization exists and is proven.
I’ve used waypipe and it worked in my testing.