Fanks

Pretend I’m an idiot (should be easy), and tell me what this all is up in here.

Sideburns? Shoulda seen that coming.

Models are definately fallible, but definately less fallible than most people.

We’ll if you agreed, you wouldnt find my position morally abhorrent, see how that works, so duh.

I asked, you answered, i responded, don’t get mad because people think differently, get mad because I’m not ever going to read your next response.

See, we agree we don’t agree, the end.

Yeah, well if they don’t want to do the hard work of filtering manually, that’s what they get, but methods are being developed that dont require so much training data, and AI is still so new, a lot could change very quickly yet.

I dont agree with that comparison to the holocaust, it’s an insult to its victims. And I dont believe it’s anywhere near over, that’d be the millionth time thats been said in 60 years.

So I dont think you know my position, we obviously have diferent views of objective reality.

If it wasn’t a fledgingling technology with a lot more advancements to be made yet, I’d worry about that.

How about we dont feed AI to itself then? Seems like that’s just a choice we could make?

I’d say it’s done, look at the damned place. If that’s not done it’s close enough.

I check its claims against verified sources. 🤷‍♂️

Which group of people on the planet hasn’t done that?

My ancestors did, as did theirs and yours. Should we all suicide over it, to make it right? Or try and pack ourselves back into where we came from? Get everyone to head back to Sumer?

What’s done is done and not accepting that seems to be the problem to me. For all parties involved.

My local model gave me this, I’m gonna go with this.

"The statement you’ve shared expresses a strong viewpoint on a highly complex and deeply contentious issue. While it’s rooted in real events—such as the displacement of Palestinians and the loss of civilian life—the way it’s framed is not fully accurate or nuanced when examined from a factual and historical perspective. Here’s a breakdown:

What’s true:

1. Displacement and Land Loss:

In 1948, the creation of the state of Israel was followed by war and the displacement of approximately 700,000 Palestinians—this is known as the Nakba (“catastrophe” in Arabic).

Since then, Palestinians have lost significant territory, and many still live as refugees or under occupation in the West Bank and Gaza.

2. Civilian Deaths:

Thousands of Palestinian civilians have indeed been killed over decades, especially in Israeli military operations in Gaza and the West Bank.

Civilian casualties are a well-documented and tragic part of the conflict.

What’s oversimplified or inaccurate:

1. “Uncomplicated conflict”:

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is widely regarded by historians, diplomats, and political scientists as one of the most complex geopolitical conflicts in modern history, involving:

Colonial history (British Mandate)

Competing nationalisms

Religion

Refugee crises

International law

Military occupation and terrorism

Internal divisions within both Israeli and Palestinian societies

2. Moral Equivalence to the Holocaust:

Comparing the conflict to the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews were systematically murdered in a state-run genocide, is historically and morally problematic.

The Holocaust was a uniquely industrialized genocide driven by Nazi ideology. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, while tragic and violent, is not a genocide by definition, though some may argue aspects of it have genocidal characteristics.

The comparison risks minimizing the Holocaust and oversimplifying the current conflict.

3. Palestinians “fighting back” like Jews in WWII:

Jews under Nazi rule had almost no means of organized resistance, facing a totalitarian regime bent on extermination.

Palestinians, particularly groups like Hamas, do engage in armed resistance and terrorism, including rocket attacks and suicide bombings, which target civilians and are widely condemned internationally.

This is not morally or tactically equivalent to the Jewish resistance in WWII.

Conclusion:

Your statement reflects a valid emotional and moral reaction to real suffering and injustice. However, from a factual and historical standpoint, it oversimplifies a deeply complex situation and makes inappropriate historical analogies.

If you’re interested, I can offer a more balanced summary of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the key historical events."

Doesnt even kind of answer my question.

Got rid of netflix when they started their ad tier. NEVER going back.

Can anyone tell me who’s actually right that GD conflict, at this point I think we’d be better off nuking the area and going on with life. Its been decades, time for actual resolution.

I used plex like a decade ago is it still the only decent option for gile share streaming?

Nuke both sides, prob solved.

How about instead of assuming i’m dumb, you answer th… no fuck it. I dont think theres any value to be had here. Goodbye.