

Um. No. And, I’m sorry, but I’m also failing to connect relevance. Just didn’t click in my brain hole, nothing against you out your rhetoric. Oh! Are you just saying, “Yeah, they’re dumb”?
Um. No. And, I’m sorry, but I’m also failing to connect relevance. Just didn’t click in my brain hole, nothing against you out your rhetoric. Oh! Are you just saying, “Yeah, they’re dumb”?
If there’s no afterlife when you die, were you ever alive at all?
Um… Yes?
Mam, I’m glad I never got into ICP. This is fuckin embarrassing.
I have seen impulsive gaslighting and malicious classified spill out of every one of these ai. Straight up doing verbal abuse.
Edit: I’m gonna go on. I forget what I was talking about, but I was connecting various facts and asking about Epstein stuff. It immediately and repeatedly classified it as non serious conspiracy, and after pressing, presented facts backing 4 out of 5 of the things it said was crazy, and there have been books written saying the exact same thing.
*a barn goes dark
Wyoming is corrupt as fuck. Coal is in charge there
Keep riding your ebikes. Please slow down and make noise when you ride past me on the sidewalk. I swear somebody almost hits every day In out walking around. A simple “Honk honk, coming through”, please.
This just in - Trump claims homework must have been eaten. Dog calls claims ridiculous and speciesist.
Let’s fix this society, if only for shorter skirts.
If you can’t say something nice…
Being online would be lot better, and I think we would learn more. Trying to implement this in myself. I wasn’t raised right.
You’re talking about hats, right?
That is clearly a Pizza Hut, you nut.
“If you can’t say something nice…”
Shouldn’t be regulated, but that’s my advice for improving discourse and awareness.
If it wasn’t already, South Park is now authoritarian propaganda.
Of course it is. It’s an llm drawing from datasets based on our own tribal, unflinching rhetoric. And almost definitely guided through monetary benchmarks.
And, kudos to the real journalists out there.
You can’t be expected to - broadly understand the world and your place in it - when every article, book, or anything else that you’ve read or studied, you’re supposed to pay for.
Most people’s politics (left-oriented as well - your “scientific rigor” is actually rather sparse and inadequately supported [just look at how often we actually fund follow-up studies]) are virtue signaling. People tend to work backward from what the in-group already assumes. No big deal - it’s just collective problem solving staged in a cannibalistic system. So, to answer your question, seemingly equal measure, though the weights change with social context.
Not like I’m gonna make art for anybody else anyway. Do I look like a fucking party clown? I’ll take your ideas, they’re gonna suck, and maybe if it’s impressive I’ll write a note I never look at again.
Judging people is bad practice, and it’s none of my business. This post reminds me of The Good Place.
Wyoming. Corrupt, cold, ugly if you’re not rich, and full of morons who do things like thank coal workers for their service.
So, I’ve been going through making profiles for everybody, starting with Jeffrey Epstein, and generating a new, connected note when I see new information (Obsidian). I’m running with the hypothesis and framework that “The Establishment” is a real criminal enterprise. What I’ve found seems to be five branches, ranging from finance to intelligence, all interconnected. Two prevalent philosophies beyond greed and power: Christen Zionism and Transhumanism. Basically, it is a big coherent effort by lots of individuals and agencies with like goals. Trump, I call the disruptor. Basically, Trump seems to be so full of himself that he thinks he can take on the system AND be a dictator, from what I’ve gathered (189 profiles, including individuals, agencies, events, timeline, doctrines)