• Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You guys are all fools. This is a good thing! The Art of the deal! This is just from Thursday:

      “We’re seeing as a result that ports here in the US, the traffic has really slowed and now thousands of dockworkers and truck drivers are worried about their jobs.”

      • Reporter

      “That means we lose less money … when you say it slowed down, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.”

      • Trump/Master Negotiator/Art of the Deal
      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        His rational is powerfully idiotic.

        “We lost money because americans spent it on Chinese made goods and not american goods.”

        For one, a lot of these goods are sold by US companies. Those jobs, that revenue on leases and equipment, are spent in the US. For two, we don’t make most of this shit here to buy at all, and in some cases like “exotic” foodstuff like coffee, we cannot make it here. Americans can literally not spend our money on something American made even if we wanted to. For three, the factories and supply chain to make the things will take decades to stand up, the same way they took decades to stand up in China, where US corporate greed for offshoring and a local authoritarian government that plans for decades, generally at the short term detriment of its people, worked together to build it.

        Putting shitty tariffs on the world wont shift the above. It has to be followed with ungodly, focused government spending for a generation. Everyone knows this shit is over in a small handful of years, not 20, so no corporation is going to make the huge investment in the US infrastructure that we would need.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      At least he has reduced the enormous amounts of pollution created by all those ships normally?

      I don’t know, I’m just trying to find a sliver of hope somewhere.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        lol, he likely hasn’t done that either. Those ships will be shipping those goods elsewhere. However, global supply chains, as much as they save money are less environmentally friendly. So, hopefully, if trade becomes less USA centric, there is an increase in lateral trade within Asia and closer partners. Given the USA is one of the least environmentally friendly countries, I would expect any increase in production there to be worse than chinas emissions.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ships barely pollute. They carry an extremely large amount of weight for the energy they use because they are on water. It’s the truck bringing it to your doorstep that creates the pollution. If you live on the coast, buying American could pollute more

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Container ships, especially large ones, are significant contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, comparable to the emissions of 50 million cars.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m sure they will find a way to blame Biden, Hillary, Obama, the DEI and the trans. Not to mention the immigrant “invasion” that they think is a real thing.