Yost’s action came the same day the high court declined to stay a preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, which sided with the measure’s backers that their First Amendment rights to free speech had likely been violated.

With Ohio’s nearly century-old ballot initiative process at risk of being permanently declared unconstitutional, Yost moved immediately to dismiss the appeal he had filed in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Yost had repeatedly rejected proposed summary language for the measure as not being a fair and accurate representation of what the measure would do.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    But if qualified immunity is taken away, does that mean police can be held responsible for their actions?

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’ll see. Ending qualified immunity means they can be charged, but doesn’t mean that they will be charged. It’s a step in the right direction, but the system will continue fighting to protect its own.