“How can I return him to the United States? I smuggle him into the United States? Of course I’m not going to do it. The question is preposterous,” Bukele said. “I don’t have the power to return him to the United States. We’re not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country.”

"To liberate 350 million people, you have to imprison some. That’s the way it works,” Bukele told Trump. Abrego Garcia has not been charged with terrorism.

Archived at https://archive.is/w3Vyt

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Trump then turned to Bukele and said of the assembled reporters: “They’d love to have a criminal released into our country. These are sick people.”

    Garcia has never been convicted of criminal charges in the US or El Salvador. It’s hard to overstate what a big fucking problem this is. Due process is dead, you’re a criminal because we say so.

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      If Trumplethinskin did not like chocolate milk then YOU could disappear FOREVER without a trace…because you like chocolate milk.

      YOU can NOW disappear FOREVER for ANY reason he can make up.

    • qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Garcia isn’t a green card holder, but he does have legal status. He’s under “withholding removal”, which is kind of asylum lite. He can live and work here, and he made regular checkins to prove he was behaving, but the government is allowed to deport him to anywhere except El Salvador, although until this they hadn’t tried.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Did any of the “reporters” there challenge them on this essential point?

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Not that I know of, likely because they don’t want to be kicked out. The white house kicked out the AP a while back for asking a question about climate change or some shit. This would get them removed and sued, no doubt, and our news organizations are either complicit or don’t have the balls/finances to push back.

        • ComfortablyDumb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Thats what happens when news is either controlled by the rich via share holding mechanism or controlled by the state. News organizations need to be owned by all the people so that they are able to challenge people in power.

            • nomy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Why do you think capitalists spent the last century fighting against communism? It’s a threat to capitalists.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          If they cannot dissent or ask act actual valid questions what’s the point of even being there? The fact that all of them have not stopped going until the AP is allowed back in tells you all you need to know about how trustworthy any of these Outlets are. Not.

          • mkwt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            This ruling was made by a Trump-appointed district court judge, and two Trump-appointed appellate judges declined to grant a last minute administrative stay.

            That goes to show just how much of a loser this AP case is for the Trump administration. Yet the administration ignored the order anyway, and they filed a paper this morning suggesting that the appellate judges merely “forgot” to issue the steady.

          • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            This part of project 2025 is explicitly labeled “ignore the courts”.

            All going according to plan.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Garcia has never been convicted of criminal charges in the US or El Salvador

      Also, you can’t, you know, legally deport a US citizen to an El Salvadorian gulag even if they had committed a crime. Trump here is trying to shift the Overton window from a discussion of if they’re a US citizen to if they’ve committed a crime (they haven’t, of course), and it’s fucking disgusting.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I don’t think Garcia was a citizen, he was a green card holder, but Trump is openly discussing sending citizens to El Salvador anyway. Nobody’s going to stop him anyway, so why the fuck not?

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Also, in 2019 ICE sought to have him removed but lost their motion argument and ended up with a court order forbidding them from doing so, which ICE never did anything to get lifted. That’s why the Trump administration has had to say they deported Kilmar by mistake, if it was anything other than a mistake (which we all know it was but don’t have smoking gun proof for) that’s intentional violation of a court order, aka the Constitutional crisis all the official people have been trying to pretend isn’t happening.