• Fives@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    The super-wealthy are a cancer on society, and just like cancer, they suck up all of the resources while killing the patient.

  • toppy@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Billionaires are a byproduct of the capitalist system. People will always try to hoard money. What governments should try is to appropriately tax people according to their wealth, material possessions, assets etc and not merely because they earn money beyond a certain arbitrary threshold. In order to do this governments have to spy on their own people. And this will make many people mad.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Had anyone ever said yet… Lin Manuel Mayoranda

    I hope he goes far and makes a lot of people uncomfortable. Brave man in a moment that needs brave people.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s inspiring to see Americans are still fighting the good fight.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Order to eliminate all billionaires confirmed! To the Priuses, we ride!

    *lift sword out window

    *slowly pull away from curb with loud prius humming noise

    /s I dont advicate violence and I agree billionaire level accrual of wealth shouldnt happen. When it does it should be taxed like FDR did it. We’ve never done so well as a country than when we had real progressive taxation. When Maga people talk about making america great agin, thats the era they are thinking about, when a single worker could support a whole family and buy a house and raise kids with a normal job, and a normals job was respected.

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to believe that’s a controversial opinion. Most people will never meet a billionaire in their lifetime, let alone become one.

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I have met two minor billionaires in my life. They were both clearly involved in some sort of organized crime activity. And both Trump supporters before it was cool.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    What is the other sides’ argument for why we SHOULD have billionaires?
    Genuinely asking if they have anything tough to contend with or is it just another critical avoidance of theirs?

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I usually get some variation of “They worked hard and deserve the reward. We shouldn’t take that away from them, they earned it fairly.” Yes, it’s infuriating.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The argument for billionaires is “why should the government be allowed to set arbitrary caps on the amount of wealth you can accumulate” which I generally agree with, but it’s clear that wealth hoarding has become a problem. Maybe we say that the most you can keep is 1 billion. Once per year, any personal wealth over 1 billion is surrendered. So you can earn as much money as you want, but you need to spend it or surrender it.

    • wagesj45@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can imagine an argument for certain artists that are so beloved that their art sells globally or they entertain at a massive scale. Think Taylor Swift, or LeBron James. You can wrangle over the specifics of any individual, of course, but in theory that seems reasonable to me on the face of it. I can also imagine a persuasive argument for a business tycoon that builds up his workforce along with his own coffers and keeps them wanting for nothing. But the circumstances around that are pretty far fetched as far as the typical sociopathic billionaire tycoon goes.

      • layzerjeyt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        AFAIK even seemingly successful musicians often don’t really make out with much cash. They incur a lot of costs even under the most “honest” industry contracts. Then there are cases of getting blatantly scammed like the Backstreet Boys or George Clinton.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d imagine it’s just the argument for capitalism. You know, profit incentive increasing efficiency and productivity and all that. Now this stuff is true to an extent (though a lot of politically active Lemmy likes to pretend otherwise), but all the good stuff happens before a single person reaches a billion dollars so if that’s the idea it would pretty much fall flat on its face.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      What is the other sides’ argument for why we SHOULD have billionaires?

      They think they’ll get a chance to bootstrap themselves into being one.